Search This Blog

Wednesday, May 29, 2024

6th lesson mantra + 2 more

Baba
6th lesson mantra

Namaskar,

Ananda Marga ideology says, "Human beings must name Parama Puruśa. If somebody says, “Don’t name Parama Puruśa, simply do dhyána [meditation],” you will discover something while meditating, also – that one has to address Parama Puruśa by name, otherwise one is not satisfied. When you meditate you have a wish to address the meditated, to say something to that party. That is, again the name comes up. Though the name is something limited, the human mind cannot help using it. Ultimately the name and the namer will no longer remain, only the named will remain. But as long as the namer and name do remain, the name has to be used – simply because one can’t help it." (1)

Every lesson of Ananda Marga sadhana has a particular mantra. However, a few who don’t read Sadguru Baba’s books do not think that the dhyana lesson has a mantra.

But in that lesson there is a system by which to address Parama Purusa. And this is a natural yearning as well; in that heightened state, the mind feels the need to address Him. In the above guideline, Sadguru states this very fact. So one is to call Him by name, just as a person always calls Him when they are in trouble. Without that, one will not be able to get dhyana siddhi.
https://anandamargauniversal.blogspot.com/

When the mind is in a proper flow, then one likes to call Him. And by this way, one feels more and more closeness and proximity, and the heart will be satisfied. Indeed, as the mind becomes more and more concentrated, then only the Entity you are calling will remain; the unit existence merges in Him. That is, slowly, slowly, the mind will be fixed on the Divine Entity and become one with that.

So it all starts with the sentimental feeling and desire to name and call Him. Then one is to call Him by name, just as people always call Him when in trouble. Gradually the mind gains more momentum and merges in the Is’t’a’, i.e. Parama Purusa Baba. That is nirvikalpa samadhi, and that is the ultimate goal of dhyana. 

Namaskar, 
In Him 
Dharma Sagar

Reference
1. Subhasita Samgraha - 11, Na'ma & Na'mii


== Section: Comment ==

Didi Ananda Giita rejects mahaprayan

Namaskar

1. WWD faction of Didi Ananda Giita does not celebrate mahaprayan (MPD).

2. Didi Ananda Giita does not believe in the concept of Mahaprayan.

3. Didi Ananda Giita thinks MPD is against devotional sentiment. She believes that MPD Guru ke na Rahne ko ingit karta hai, so it is against our Devotional sentiment.

Didi Ananda Giita has expressed all this on the What's APP Proutist Forum.

Namaskar.
Ragini


== Section 2: Links ==

Tuesday, May 28, 2024

Female issues + 3 more

Baba
Female issues
Namaskar,

According to Ananda Marga philosophy, one's inherent capacity should be used for the welfare of society. Among their qualities, men possess physical might so they should be the ones involved in physically strenuous activities that demand tremendous might. In contrast, women possess their own set of strengths that can be applied for the betterment of society.
http://anandamarganewsbulletin.blogspot.com


Caring for infants: males feel emotionally frustrated


For instance, males do not have the right temperament or sentiment to raise infants. That is why in the west we see a rash of Shaken Baby Syndrome (SBS): "Shaken baby syndrome (SBS) is a form of physical child abuse that occurs when an abuser [predominantly male] violently shakes an infant or small child, creating a whiplash-type motion that results permanent brain damage and even death." So it is the males that feel emotionally overwhelmed and challenged by the prospect of caring for infants. (See Note 1)

In contrast, females have greater sentimental feeling and greater attraction toward the baby. Naturally women are more suited to raising young babies and infants. In addition, Baba has said that Didis should demand running all the primary schools of Ananda Marga. Here the point is that wherever emotion and sentiment are paramount, then females will do that work better than males. Whereas physically tough jobs like using a bulldozer, working on a garbage truck, or managing a chain saw should be for men.
http://anandamarganewsbulletin.blogspot.com

Certainly, anybody can do anything - there are always exceptions - but generally women will harm themselves doing hard physical labor like extreme manual labour. So the basic rule is that males should do physically demanding work, and females should attend to sentimental jobs. When these roles are switched - i.e. when men engage in things that demand sentiment or when women attend to duties that demand physical might - then problems invariably arise. 


All have inherent limitations

This letter is not intended for fault-finding with or accusing any gender. This is for everyone's welfare. We all have our limitations. Humans cannot glide or fly like birds without a machine so sane people do not jump out of tall buildings and try to fly in the sky. Likewise, regardless of our gender, we should be aware of our inherent strengths and limitations.

Around the globe, in the general society, females have been exploited so much that there has developed a certain competition between the sexes. Rather than being complementary to one another, there is the feeling of competition to outdo the other. Hence, many women have turned to trying to outgun their male counterparts in traditionally male areas of ability. This is an unfortunate development born out of years and generations of the exploitation and suppression of women.
http://anandamarganewsbulletin.blogspot.com


Strenuous work severely restricted


Some women state that women should not be put in harm's way by dealing with physically strenuous work responsibilities, while a very vocal group of women demand that women must be given the right to match male toe-to-toe in strenuous activities etc. In our Ananda Marga, we have our stand based on Baba's teachings. Males and females have different physical characteristics and capacities. In particular, males are physically stronger than females.

Ananda Marga philosophy states, "There are people who, in the name of giving equal rights to women in all spheres of life, want them to engage in heavy physical and mental labour which is unsuitable for them. Such an outlook is deplorable. It must be accepted that the physical bodies and nervous systems of women are not as strong as those of men, so men and women cannot work in identical areas. Apart from this, for physical reasons women cannot work in the same way every day of the month, and during pregnancy and the post-delivery period the ability to work strenuously is severely restricted. These points must not be overlooked." (1)


Ideal: neither children nor society are adversely affected


Ananda Marga philosophy guides us, “As in the societies of most other species, in human society also females are physically weaker than males. Because their nervous systems are weaker, their minds are also slightly weak. Nevertheless women have no less value in human society than men. Selfish men, however, have disregarded the value of women; they have taken full advantage, and are continuing to take full advantage, of their weakness. Although men have publicly declared that women should be respected as the mothers of society, they have actually relegated them to the status of domestic cattle and sheep." (2)

Ananda Marga philosophy states, “The physical and mental structure of a woman is such that even though she may have all the requisite ability to take care of her children, it is extremely difficult for her to bring them up properly and to adequately provide for food, clothing, education and medical care all alone; at the same time she has to keep her children with her or near her, or else it becomes difficult for the children to survive. Therefore if men, instead of women, take the main responsibility for providing food and clothing, while women, after duly attending to the needs of the children, where possible or in cases of necessity earn money by working either at home or outside, neither the children nor society will be adversely affected in any way." (3)

Ananda Marga philosophy guides us, “As the physical strength of women is less than that of men, the latter should always endeavour to save the prestige of women...Special attention should be paid to the comforts of women during festivals, at spiritual conferences, and on other occasions." (4)

Because males are stronger that is why games and sports are done separately: Women compete against women, and men compete against men. Clearly then, females do not have the physical strength and stamina that males have. So less physical strength is one key reason we do not support burdening women with extremely strenuous physically demanding work etc. 
http://anandamarganewsbulletin.blogspot.com


Another difference between men & women


Physical strength is not the only physical difference between males and females. For instance, the female cranium is smaller than the male cranium. That is one basic physical difference. Generally speaking, a bigger cranium means more brain power. We see that in any species where the brain is smaller it is less developed. And when the brain is bigger it is more developed.

However, humans are unique in this regard. Much of the brain capacity of humans goes unused. The human brain has a tremendous capacity. So regardless of whether one is a male or female, much of their brain power is unused. There is very little practical difference between males and females in this regard. You will find foolish males and intelligent females and vice versa. Here is Baba's teaching about the size of the cranium.

Ananda Marga philosophy states, “Generally the cranium of a female is smaller than that of a male. If you see the skull of a female skeleton, you will notice that the upper portion of the skull is smaller. Those who are eunuchs by birth have still smaller craniums...If a male becomes a female by biological processes, he will not suffer from headaches as such; he will have no difficulty. But if a female becomes a male, she will suffer difficulties because the cranium is smaller; that is, the brain is smaller." (5)

The overall point is that Baba clearly points out that there are distinct physical differences between males and females. But there is no need to develop a complex about why males and females are not equal in physical might. Those trying to rebuff this idea are harming themselves.
http://anandamarganewsbulletin.blogspot.com

Competing physically


Here are some of the stated reasons being championed by women who feel women should not be pushed to physical exertion in competition with men. In order to compete with men physically, many women sacrifice their womanhood and take steroids to develop muscles etc. But this creates a hormonal imbalance as well as psychic imbalance. In many cases, they lose their fertility. This point is embedded within a greater schema. When women aim to compete with men in male-oriented activities, then they end up harming themselves. Allowing women to engage in extremely strenuous and physically demanding work is only going to exacerbate this problem. More women will suffer the ill effects of competing with men in male-driven endeavors.


Conclusion


We should not allow females to compete with males in very strenuous activities. Females will be harmed; society will be harmed; and children will be harmed. There is no benefit in any direction. Males and females are both the creation of Parama Purusa. Parama Purusa has made those physical bodies so we should not destroy them needlessly by competing with one another on the wrong front.

Namaskar,
In Him,
Shobha’

About shaken baby syndrome

Shaken baby syndrome happens primarily with male guardians, less so with female guardians. A mother who is truly attached with her baby can never do such things. Males are more apt to get frustrated and act inappropriately with the baby. Sometimes paid nannies and baby-sitters also act in this way. Why does this happen? Because, at that young age the baby cries, cries, and cries. Those not wholly attached with the baby can get frustrated and unnerved by that crying. They might shake the baby violently, but not the mother. 
http://anandamarganewsbulletin.blogspot.com


~ In-depth study ~

Role of women & gender issues


From Wikipedia: ”The female skeletal system is less dense, and more prone to breakages. There is also a concern that, in aviation, the female body is not as adept at handling the increased g-forces experienced by combat pilots...Furthermore, health issues regarding women are argued as the reason that some submarine services avoid accepting women...The Center for Military Readiness, an organization that seeks to limit women's participation in the military, stated that “Female soldiers [are], on average, shorter and smaller than men, with 45-50% less upper body strength and 25-30% less aerobic capacity, which is essential for endurance”." (Wikipedia)

Ananda Marga philosophy guides us, “In every sphere of life men have either substantially limited the rights of women, or made the ability of women to exercise their rights subject to the whims and caprices of men. Such an attitude never existed among the primitive human beings who lived at the dawn of human history. Nor had primitive men conceived of the deceitful practice of establishing their supremacy by keeping women in bondage in the name of social purity. Even today among primitive races we do not find significant lack of magnanimity concerning the freedom of women." (6)

Ananda Marga philosophy states, “Actually, when there is no question of women's rights having been snatched away, there is no need for a movement styled on the trade-union movement. Whatever responsibility there may be in this regard, it is entirely that of men. If at all a movement is required, it must be implemented by men themselves. Today men should consider the needs of women and gradually restore to women the rights which women once entrusted to men out of feelings of helplessness or in response to their heartfelt sentiments." (7)

License should not be encouraged in the name of liberty


Ananda Marga philosophy guides us, “When we pay recognition to any simple truth, we should not be carried away by sentimentality. Only rationality based on humanism is acceptable. As children of nature, women should have the same access as men to light, air, earth and water. In fact, it is not a matter of granting rights to women, but rather a case of recognizing their rights. If, however, the recognition of women's rights is treated sentimentally, it may result in great social disaster." (8)

Ananda Marga philosophy guides us, “In most countries society is patrilineal. The patrilineal system has some advantage over the matrilineal one. There are two main advantages. The first advantage stems from the fact that it is not as easy to determine the identity of the father as that of the mother, and in the absence of any direct blood relationship the mother's affection for her children is generally greater than the father's. Under these circumstances the patrilineal system is much better, for it awakens in the father a proper sense of responsibility for his children and precludes the possibility of the children's identity remaining unknown or concealed. And the father is compelled by circumstantial pressure to take responsibility for bringing up his children; and therefore makes an effort to properly preserve the structure of the family. (Among less-developed creatures, fathers rarely take care of their offspring due to the absence of this sort of circumstantial pressure.)” (9)
  
Ananda Marga philosophy guides us, “It must always be remembered that freedom, or liberty, and license are not the same thing. The concept of women's freedom is good, but license should not be encouraged in the name of liberty. Giving license to either men or women could destroy the social structure in a short time. Hence those who are the most vocal in proposing the freedom of women must carefully consider the form this proposed freedom shall take." (10)


Dogma: to spend their lives with ladles, tongs, & spatulas


Ananda Marga philosophy states, “The second advantage of the patrilineal system complements the first. Since the relationship between the father and the child is known, the mother naturally does not feel so very alone in rearing the child. The physical and mental structure of a woman is such that even though she may have all the requisite ability to take care of her children, it is extremely difficult for her to bring them up properly and to adequately provide for food, clothing, education and medical care all alone; at the same time she has to keep her children with her or near her, or else it becomes difficult for the children to survive. Therefore if men, instead of women, take the main responsibility for providing food and clothing, while women, after duly attending to the needs of the children, where possible or in cases of necessity earn money by working either at home or outside, neither the children nor society will be adversely affected in any way." (11)

Ananda Marga philosophy states, “I do not support the supposed wisdom of those who advise women to spend their lives with ladles, [[tongs]] and spatulas, because this is unrealistic. Necessity often compels women to discard this convention. Such a system may suit a handful of rich or upper middle-class people, but it has no value for day-labourers or the poor. Many of those who loudly advocate equal rights and the freedom of women, in reality keep their women behind a purdah or covered with a burka. Even among such families I have noticed poor housewives going to the market with their husbands to buy and sell, or to the fields, farms or coal mines, voluntarily taking on light work. Evidently, they cannot afford to behave ostentatiously and live indolently behind a lace curtain." (12)


Manual labour: men & women cannot work in identical areas

    
Ananda Marga philosophy states, “Social interaction: There are diverse views among those who formulate social codes concerning the free mixing of men and women. It does not require much logic to convince people that the final outcome of free mixing in an undisciplined society is unhealthy. It is also true, however, that the absence of social interaction creates a suppressed longing, a special attraction or an unhealthy curiosity, as does the denial of other desires. This may lead to illicit mixing, which eventually undermines social purity. A system that thwarts social interaction is nothing but an attempt to suppress the mind. Where there is illicit mixing, the only harm done to men is that they degenerate morally, but the damage to women is far greater, because they may be cast out of society in disgrace. Thus on the one hand, men and women will have to be free to mix together socially, while on the other hand, a well-thought-out code of self-control will have to guide their social interaction." (13)

Ananda Marga philosophy states, “However, there are people who, in the name of giving equal rights to women in all spheres of life, want them to engage in heavy physical and mental labour which is unsuitable for them. Such an outlook is deplorable. It must be accepted that the physical bodies and nervous systems of women are not as strong as those of men, so men and women cannot work in identical areas. Apart from this, for physical reasons women cannot work in the same way every day of the month, and during pregnancy and the post-delivery period the ability to work strenuously is severely restricted. These points must not be overlooked." (14)


Making women wear burkas, are entirely farcical


Ananda Marga philosophy states, “The trend of the age is irresistible, for in this too there is dynamism. It is the duty of intelligent people to channelize the trend of the age towards the path of benevolence by applying their intellect. Neither the individual nor the society as a whole is capable of resisting the powerful spirit of the age. It knocks down anyone who tries to thwart it, and proceeds ahead with irresistible speed. Those knocked down and sprawled on the ground stare at it in utter helplessness, with dazed minds and vacant eyes, as it marches by." (15)

Ananda Marga philosophy states, “Those who want to keep their daughters away from the influence of modernism, and are therefore reluctant to send them to school and college, perhaps do not realize that long ago the waves of modernism intruded into the privacy of their homes without their knowledge. So their efforts to protect their daughters and themselves by following the custom of purdah and making women wear burkas, are entirely farcical." (16)

http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/000004.htm

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/10/nyregion/li-hangbin-goes-on-trial-in-shaken-baby-death-of-his-daughter.html?_r=0

References
1. Human Society - 1, Social Justice
2. Human Society - 1, Social Justice
3. Human Society - 1, Social Justice
4. Caryacarya 1, "Social Relationship between Men and Women"
5. Yoga Psychology, The Human Body Is a Biological Machine
6. Human Society - 1, Social Justice
7. Human Society - 1, Social Justice
8. Human Society - 1, Social Justice
9. Human Society - 1, Social Justice
10. Human Society - 1, Social Justice
11. Human Society - 1, Social Justice
12. Human Society - 1, Social Justice
13. Human Society - 1, Social Justice
14. Human Society - 1, Social Justice
15. Human Society - 1, Social Justice
16. Human Society - 1, Social Justice


== Section: Important Teaching ==

Quiz: do you know the answer?


Ananda Marga philosophy states, “Those who believe in the equal distribution of the world’s wealth, naively underestimate the power of moha vrtti. The human mind can be sublimated only by spiritual ideation, not by any high-sounding philosophy. This utopian idea has proved ineffective in the past and in the present and will continue to prove so in the future." (1)

They missed the point about infatuation vrtii

Answer: In His above teaching, Baba is indirectly referring to communist leaders. They underestimated moha vrtii with regards to the people’s attachment for their land or wealth. Those communist leaders were fascinated with their own philosophy and could not understand that the common folk would not like giving up their land or wealth. So when their land or wealth was taken from them, the farming suffered. Not enough food was produced; and the end result was widespread starvation and strife. The root cause of the problem was that those communists failed to take into consideration moha vrtti. Forcibly taking the people’s land or wealth set off this entire negative chain of events.

Reference:
1. Ananda Marga Philosophy - 8, The Acoustic Roots of the Indo-Aryan Alphabet


== Section 3: Links ==

Monday, May 27, 2024

Se necesita fuerza y persuasión

Baba

Se necesita fuerza y persuasión

Namaskar,

Baba ha dado un enfoque especial para restringir y eliminar las actividades pecaminosas y promover un código de conducta adecuado, es decir, transformar a la gente común en moralistas estrictos.

En un resumen en español de Ananda Vacanamrtam - 10, "The Witness-ship of Parama Puruśa Is of Supreme Importance", p.190, Baba nos dice: Puedes ayudar a alguien a convertirse en bueno haciéndole comprender [los valores morales], pero nadie se convierte en bueno mediante la aplicación de la fuerza [el castigo]... Si el pecador se dedica a actos pecaminosos o sigue avanzando por un camino pecaminoso, puedes impedir que esa persona lo haga mediante la aplicación de la fuerza [el castigo]. Pero no se puede transformar [crear moralistas] de esta manera. (resumen en español)


Puntos clave para transformar a los demás

1. El arte de la persuasión (es decir, la lógica y el razonamiento) es la vía para transformar a alguien en una persona verdaderamente buena. Esto implica enseñar los valores de la moralidad, inculcar un sentimiento de obediencia y responsabilidad, e inspirarles en la sadhana, etc. Persuadiendo, convenciendo y animando a alguien de esta manera, puede convertirse en un verdadero benefactor de la sociedad, en una persona verdaderamente buena.

2. La aplicación de la fuerza (es decir, la amenaza, el miedo al castigo) nunca permitirá que uno se convierta en bueno. Eso significa que utilizar tácticas de miedo o amenazar a alguien con privación de la libertad, penas de cárcel y repercusiones negativas por sus fechorías no le permitirá convertirse en una buena persona.

3. La aplicación de la fuerza sirve para disuadir a una persona de realizar actividades antisociales. Si una persona depravada comprende que será encarcelada por obrar mal, eso puede disuadirla de cometer malas acciones. Este es el principal beneficio del uso de la fuerza. Pero la aplicación de la fuerza y el miedo a las repercusiones no impulsarán a nadie a convertirse en una persona recta y verdaderamente buena.


Uso equilibrado de la persuasión y la fuerza

Tanto la fuerza como la persuasión son necesarias. Primero hay que cultivar el deseo interior. Hay que inculcarle los medios para convertirse en un verdadero ser humano y en un activo para la sociedad. Esto es lo que se entiende por persuasión. Después, cuando la persuasión y la educación han inculcado la creación de buenos ciudadanos, los gobiernos pueden aplicar tácticas de miedo y la fuerza para establecer la ley y el orden y evitar que la gente haga cosas perjudiciales.

Por desgracia, en la actualidad, la persuasión no se lleva a cabo de manera eficaz. Ese mensaje instrumental de conducta moral, sentido de la responsabilidad, obediencia y otras enseñanzas dhármicas está siendo totalmente ahogado por los canales negativos de los medios de comunicación y los elementos degradantes de la sociedad. Por eso el orden social está desequilibrado en la actualidad. Sólo mediante la correcta ejecución del doble enfoque -es decir, la persuasión y la fuerza- puede formarse una sociedad adecuada.


Las tácticas del miedo no bastan

Hoy en día, en todo el mundo, los gobiernos han adoptado en su mayoría un enfoque unilateral de la ley y el orden. La administración dicta normas y encarga a la policía y al ejército que las hagan cumplir. Sin embargo, según las enseñanzas de Baba, este enfoque unilateral no es una forma eficaz de crear una sociedad humana adecuada. Este estilo tampoco funciona bien en la vida familiar, ni en la vida comunitaria, ni en nuestra vida social de AMPS. La aplicación de la fuerza con el miedo al castigo es, por sí misma, ineficaz para construir un orden social sano. Esto es cierto tanto si se trata de 5 personas en una unidad familiar, como de un colectivo mayor de personas.

Cuando sólo se emplean tácticas de miedo, y cuando no se convence, persuade o educa adecuadamente a los miembros del público en general sobre lo que se debe y no se debe hacer, no se puede rectificar ni convertir a las personas en buenos ciudadanos. Cuando los gobiernos sólo recurren al miedo a la policía y a la cárcel, en realidad aumenta la delincuencia. Cuando hay escasez de buenas personas y un número creciente de depravados, no es posible aplicar la cantidad de fuerza necesaria sobre todas las personas en todo momento para evitar que hagan daño.

Aunque es menos probable que las personas cometan delitos cuando creen que la policía está presente o cuando piensan que pueden ser atrapadas, recurren a la actividad delictiva cuando piensan que pueden salirse con la suya. Este es el resultado negativo que se produce cuando sólo se aplica la fuerza para controlar a la sociedad, y hay una ausencia de persuasión para ayudar a las personas a convertirse en buenos ciudadanos.

Inyectar únicamente el miedo a ser encarcelado no es la solución adecuada; eso no conducirá al desarrollo de una sociedad adecuada, ni evitará que la gente cometa malas acciones. Tampoco el miedo al castigo conducirá al crecimiento de un entorno familiar sano, especialmente con adolescentes, etc.


Se necesitan buenos ejemplos para enseñar moralidad y dharma

Ciertamente, la aplicación de la fuerza tiene su valor inherente y debe ser una herramienta para mantener la ley y el orden. Y es deber de la policía y de los agentes del orden utilizar esta técnica. Al mismo tiempo, debe entenderse que no es deber de esos agentes del orden enseñar moralidad y contar historias inspiradoras, etc. Hay otras asociaciones, grupos de servicio e individuos que deben cumplir ese papel. Y ciertamente ese papel está en boga, pero no al nivel requerido. Padres, profesores, grupos de acción comunitaria, acaryas y otros están profundamente implicados -a distintos niveles- en convencer y persuadir a la gente para que sea buena. Y aún queda mucho trabajo por hacer. En todos los frentes, los padres y los administradores escolares también pueden utilizar la fuerza o el miedo al castigo para disuadir a los jóvenes de hacer daño.

Uno de los principales obstáculos para persuadir a la gente de que siga principios morales es que la pseudocultura, los medios de comunicación, las películas, los programas de televisión, la música pop, los sitios web degradados y las tendencias degradantes de la sociedad tienen una influencia y una voz mucho mayores. Esos medios proyectan un mensaje muy materialista, lleno de violencia, indulgencia, lujuria, etc. Los organismos sociales dominantes -empresas y corporaciones- encienden las propensiones más bajas para ganar dinero. Y difunden sus mensajes depravantes por todas partes para obtener beneficios. En ese caso, la voz sensible de los buenos padres, profesores y grupos comunitarios se ahoga fácilmente. Trágicamente, eso es lo que está ocurriendo hoy en día. Y por eso la sociedad va en picada. A medida que se establezcan más canales adecuados de educación y persuasión, poco a poco podremos levantar a la sociedad de su estado actual. Ese es el gran reto de hoy en día.


Cómo el niño puede ser un Ananda Margii ideal

La enseñanza sobre la persuasión y la aplicación de la fuerza se aplica por igual a todas las esferas de la vida, incluida la vida familiar. No se puede obligar a los niños a ser Ananda Margiis ideales, pero se les puede enseñar, educar, persuadir y convencer psicológicamente para que lleven una vida dhármica. Inculcándoles puntos de yama y niyama y enseñándoles sadhana, así como lo que se debe y no se debe hacer en la vida social, esos niños sin duda crecerán y se convertirán en buenas personas, es decir, en sadhakas y sadvipras ideales. Y sí, mediante la aplicación de la fuerza, se puede disuadir a los niños de hacer daño e intimidar a otros, robar y cometer otras fechorías, etc. Pero no se puede obligar a un niño a convertirse en sadhu. Para eso se necesita persuasión y una educación adecuada, enseñanzas morales y sadhana.

Por el contrario, sólo obligar a un niño a hacer sadhana no dará ningún fruto. Si se les amenaza con que deben hacer sadhana, seguir yama y niyama y convertirse en sadhu, eso nunca funcionará. La fuerza o el castigo sólo pueden utilizarse para disuadirles de hacer el mal. No les ayudará ni les inspirará a hacer lo correcto.


Manera de cultivar el deseo interior

Debemos enseñar la lógica y el razonamiento de por qué las reglas de Ananda Marga son beneficiosas, entonces se desarrollará de forma natural el deseo interior de seguir esas reglas. Y entonces uno estará mejor capacitado para enseñar e inspirar a otros. Este es tanto un método individual como un enfoque colectivo. Se debe inculcar un impulso interior cuando uno desea seguir los principios dhármicos. Entonces uno puede convertirse en un verdadero sadhaka. Aquellos inspirados en el fondo de su corazón a seguir las enseñanzas de Ananda Marga progresan en el camino de la espiritualidad y se convierten en verdaderos portadores de la antorcha para la sociedad.

En la sociedad, cuando se trata con ladrones y criminales, se aplica la fuerza; y, cuando se trata con margiis y monjes, Baba regañaba a los malhechores para que dejaran de delinquir. Paralelamente, Sadguru Baba persuadía e inspiraba a todos los Ananda Margiis con discursos y enseñanzas sobre cómo llevar una vida dhármica. Mediante este doble enfoque de persuasión y aplicación de la fuerza, se hicieron muchos progresos, por Su gracia.

Del mismo modo, con nuestros hijos y en particular con los adolescentes, no podemos obligarles a convertirse en moralistas y sadhus, sólo podemos obligarles a no cometer delitos. Por eso hay que utilizar la educación y la persuasión para inspirar a esos adolescentes en el camino de los Dieciséis Puntos y el bhagavad dharma. Entonces crecerán mucho. Por desgracia, en la sociedad en general, este elemento de persuasión dhármica está esencialmente ausente, ahogado por el ruido de la pseudocultura y las actividades depravantes.

Los tribunales y la policía sólo pueden impedir que una persona cometa delitos, etc. Esos cuerpos de seguridad y judiciales son incapaces de transformar a uno en un moralista. Se necesita el doble enfoque de Baba. Por la fuerza uno puede prevenir a otros de hacer actividades criminales dañinas, y con persuasión podemos transformar a la gente ordinaria en moralistas estrictos y dharmikas, por Su gracia. Debemos seguir este método en (a) Ananda Marga Pracaraka Samgha, (b) la vida familiar - especialmente con nuestros adolescentes, y (c) la sociedad en general.


Conclusión

En un resumen en español de Ananda Vacanamrtam - 10, "The Witness-ship of Parama Puruśa Is of Supreme Importance", p.190, Baba nos dice: Puedes ayudar a alguien a volverse bueno haciéndole comprender [los valores morales], pero nadie se vuelve bueno mediante la aplicación de la fuerza [el castigo]... Si el pecador está involucrado en actos pecaminosos o sigue avanzando por un camino pecaminoso, puedes evitar que esa persona lo haga mediante la aplicación de la fuerza [el castigo]. Pero no puedes transformar [crear moralistas] de esta manera. (resumen en español)

He aquí los puntos clave a tener en cuenta:
1. Mediante la aplicación de la fuerza, puedes disuadir a la gente de hacer el mal.
2. Mediante la persuasión puedes inspirarles para que se conviertan en mejores seres humanos.
3. Ambos aspectos son necesarios; un enfoque unilateral no es suficiente.

Namaskar,
En Él,
Shiva Kumar

SUBJECTS TOPICS