Baba
How to capture another country
Namaskar,
In 1949, the Chinese Communist government seized control of Xinjiang
province which is far, far to the west of Beijing. The native people are
Turks, the largest population of which is the Uighur community. To take
control and establish dominance, the Chinese officials began relocating
its Han Chinese people to that area. They now outnumber the locals in
all respects. The Han Chinese are migrants to the region yet they’ve
become the dominant group and are imposing their cultural will. This is
an age-old strategy.
https://anandamargauniversal.blogspot.com/
How China took over Tibet
Prout philosophy states, "When the British handed over power to Mr. De
Valera, they divided the country into Northern Ireland and Southern
Ireland. Many settlers came from England and settled down in the extreme
northern portion of the country. In the same way the Chinese sent many
people to settle in Tibet so that the Chinese population would outnumber
the population of Tibet, and finally Tibet would become a part of
China. When Manchuria was occupied by Japan it was renamed Manchu-ko,
and many Japanese settlers were sent there so that the Manchurians would
be outnumbered by the foreigners. The same thing happened in the case
of Ireland. England sent many people to settle in the northern corner of
the country." (1)
In Xinjiang province where the Uihgurs are now vastly outnumbered, the
same technique has been employed. The local Uighur population is quite
suffocated by the presence of the Han Chinese because the Han Chinese do
not consider themselves to be part of that land per se, but are trying
to take that place as their own. This area known as Xinjiang province
used to be its own country, just as Tibet used to be independent. All
this creates strife, struggle and so many problems like the killings and
brutal beatings in Urumqi, the capital of Xinjiang province.
Around the globe, there are many areas where locals are slowly being
outnumbered by outsiders such as in the Philippines and parts of Africa
where the Chinese are massively increasing their numbers. Those
countries should be vigilant and alert - lest they lose their autonomy.
For all these reasons, Prout’s mandate is that under no circumstances
should migratory workers be allowed.
https://anandamargauniversal.blogspot.com/
Prevent outsiders from joining local economy
Prout philosophy states, "Outsiders must be strictly prevented from interfering in the local economy." (2)
Instead those workers should be given a means to live in their homeland.
Or if going to another land, they must merge their interest with the
local interest. Prout's policy is that one may only work in a different
land under the following condition.
Prout’s policy is, "The fundamental issue is whether or not each person
or family has identified their individual socio-economic interests with
the collective interests of the concerned socio-economic unit." (3)
According to Prout, a person may only live and work in another region if
they have merged their socio-economic interests with that area. Merely
going there to get a job or impose one’s culture is not part of Prout as
it leads to the destruction of the local people, ongoing wars, death,
and bloodshed.
How China will capture other countries
At present, the biggest transgressor is China. With their booming
population, rising internal strife and discontent, growing wealth
disparity, and emerging economic influence etc, the Chinese are
exporting their populations all over the globe. Their aim is to gain
political control, exert economic influence, capture local resources,
and direct the country.
For years in China, there was a single birth policy, whereas the hoards
of Chinese who lived outside - such as in Africa, SE Asia, North
America, or elsewhere - were strongly encouraged to produce many
children - just like the Muslims do. That was a key component of
capturing the area. And the results are quite contentious as those
regions are marred by bloodshed, tension, brutality, and street riots
etc.
https://anandamargauniversal.blogspot.com/
Prout’s warnings
The overall issue is alarming and from the get-go Shrii Prabhat Ranjan
Sarkar - the Propounder of Prout - has warned of the dangers. His
Proutistic guidelines offer so many red flags as to the adverse effect
of a floating, migratory workforce.
Prout philosophy states, "For economic democracy is that outsiders must
be strictly prevented from interfering in the local economy. The outflow
of local capital must be stopped by strictly preventing outsiders or a
floating population from participating in any type of economic activity
in the local area." (4)
Prout philosophy states, "The psychological defect of a floating
population is this – the people fail to accept a new locality as their
own home, so they cannot forget the land they left behind." (5)
Prout philosophy states, "The population of every socio-economic unit
should be organized on a scientific basis. The problem of a floating
population should be tackled on the block level itself. Where there is a
floating population, it should be either permanently settled or
returned to its original region." (6)
Prout philosophy states, "The elimination of the floating population
will also protect the social life of the cooperative from the
possibility of adverse social influences." (7)
Solution
Although it is a complex issue, Shri Prabhat Ranjan Sarkar has addressed
it from all angles and given a comprehensive solution. Those living and
working in an area must accept that place as their own by merging their
identity with the interests of that locale.
Prout philosophy states, "Local people are those who have merged their
individual socio-economic interests with the socio-economic interests of
the socio-economic unit they live in. Clearly, this concept of local
people has nothing to do with physical complexion, race, caste, creed,
language or birth place. The fundamental issue is whether or not each
person or family has identified their individual socio-economic
interests with the collective interests of the concerned socio-economic
unit. Those who have not done so should be branded as outsiders." (8)
If one fails to embrace the new, local place and join the interests of
those people, then they must not be allowed to go and live there. That
is the Proutistic teaching. Side by side, in all areas, local people
should be guaranteed work, then they will not turn toward becoming a
migratory worker.
Prout guides us, "In economic democracy local people will hold economic
power. Consequently, local raw materials will be used to promote the
economic prosperity of the local people. That is to say, the raw
materials of one socio-economic unit should not be exported to another
unit. Instead, industrial centres should be built up wherever raw
materials are available. This will create industries based on locally
available raw materials and ensure full employment for all local
people." (9)
https://anandamargauniversal.blogspot.com/
Namaskar,
in Him,
Rupmay
~ In-depth study ~
Cause is one - problems are many
This problem is not entirely one-sided. The problem is not just that
outside workers are coming to a new place and pushing aside local people
and customs. Outside workers are leaving their areas for a reason. They
are getting squeezed out. No one likes to leave their hearth and home,
their friends and family unnecessarily. But people are forced to migrate
or float to a place where they can survive.
With no other option, they often go in search of work, leaving their
family behind. This happened centuries and decades ago with the rise of
many cities in the west. And now all over the globe it is happening.
Africans are heading to Europe for work; Mexicans and Central Americans
are entering the US; the Chinese are going all over Southeast Asia. It
is a pervasive issue. And behind it all, greedy capitalists are trying
to control the resources, minerals, and land of far-away areas.
Although the root cause is one - migratory workers - the problem gets
expressed in multiple ways and in the end local people clash with
migrant populations and neither are happy. Migrant peoples were forced
to leave their original place due to intolerable living situations and
the local people feel threatened and suppressed by the arrival of
outside workers. The situation does not work well for anybody.
Throughout His Prout teachings Shrii PR Sarkar has warned that this does
not bode well for humanity. Unfortunately, this very problem is
mounting as (a) capitalists have their sight set on resources in distant
places and (b) local people are forced to leave their homeland.
https://anandamargauniversal.blogspot.com/
Prout brings smooth progress of society
The awful situation in Xinjiang should stand as a warning to all. This
is what happens with the rise of a migratory workforce and huge
population influx. Social discord and chaos results and it is not easy
to restore a sense of peace. All such situations should be prevented and
all areas forewarned about the impending disaster. Prout philosophy
offers the solution and if applied now, so much fighting and bloodshed
can still be averted..
Prout philosophy states, “Economic democracy will devise ways and means to effect the smooth progress of society." (10)
By applying the principles of Prout regarding immigration and a floating
labour market / migratory worker, all such crises will be solved and
future crises will be prevented. This is quite relevant to the world we
live in today.
Everyone should be aware
Crackdowns and rioting in Urumqi are regular affairs as the Chinese seek
to control this capital city of Xinjiang province. The world looks on
in shock as huge clash occurs between the local Uighur population and
the ruling Han Chinese, fueled by the ongoing migration of Chinese
nationalists to that far distant province.The spilling of blood, the
killing, the ethnic cleansing - all this horror has devastated the
region.
Long ago Shrii Prabhat Ranjan Sarkar - the Propounder of Prout
philosophy - warned of this very problem and stated that there can never
be peace where migrant worker populations or floating laborers are used
and encouraged.The world did not listen then and still no one is
listening today as this very circumstance which caused the riots in
Urumqi touches down in so many other regions across the globe. The
result will be absolutely disastrous if prompt action is not taken.
Everyone in all places should be aware.
References
1. Prout in a Nutshell - 19, The Short History of Ireland
2. Prout in a Nutshell - 21, Economic Democracy
3. Proutist Economics, Decentralized Economy – 1
4. Prout in a Nutshell - 21, Economic Democracy
5. Prout in a Nutshell - 21, Economic Democracy
6. A Few Problems Solved - 8, Block-Level Planning
7. Prout in a Nutshell - 14, Cooperatives
8. Proutist Economics, Decentralized Economy – 1
9. Prout in a Nutshell - 21, Economic Democracy
10. Prout in a Nutshell - 21, Economic Democracy
* * *
The below sections are entirely different topics, unrelated to the above material.
They stand on their own as points of interest.
* * *
== Section 2: Important Teaching ==
Which religions sees the world this way
Ananda Marga philosophy states, "At one time people were told that this
world is for human enjoyment only, so the existence of all the plants,
of all the birds and animals, in the world is intended merely to provide
objects of enjoyment for human beings. Their hopes and aspirations,
their intense desire to live, their pains and pleasures, their
affectionate family or community lives are simply without value. However
much a baby goat may wish to live, the main consideration is how much
meat that kid carries on its frame. This defective philosophy has made
people ruthlessly violent – even more dangerous than blood-thirsty
tigers. Tigers kill only to fill their stomachs, to preserve their
physical existence; whereas human beings kill animals mostly out of
greed. Generally people have resorted to hypocrisy to camouflage this
instinct of greed; they have killed animals on the pretext of pleasing
the gods, while actually their main motive in doing so was to please
their own tongues. These are all the inevitable results of such
defective philosophies." (1)
Answer: Baba is talking about the Semitic religions.
Reference
1. Namah Shivaya Shantaya, Shiva's Teachings – 2 (continued) (Discourse 14)
== Section 3: Important Teaching ==
Sadhana & groupism are inversely related
In His below teaching, Baba guides us that when we see someone
supporting a particular group or an agenda based on caste, creed,
colour, race, then we should be alert. By digging down, we will find
that the person is not sincere in sadhana. Because Ananda Marga sadhana
is the sadhana of the infinite Parama Purusa. By ideating on Him, the
mind becomes larger and larger. That is why standard sadhakas do not
support any kind of groupism etc. So watch out: if someone is supporting
any group then try to politely convey that they should increase their
sadhana. By this way their mind will expand, and in result from the core
of their heart they will naturally keep its distance from the lowly
outlook of groupism etc. This following quote from Sadguru guides us in
this direction.
Ananda Marga philosophy says, "The more the human mind becomes
magnanimous or expanded, the more it rises above the sentiments of
tribalism, communalism, provincialism, etc. Often I hear people say that
nationalism is an appreciable sentiment and that there is no narrowness
in it. But is this true? Nationalism is also relative, just like
tribalism, communalism or provincialism. In some places it is more
worthwhile than tribalism, communalism or provincialism, while in other
places it is less worthwhile..."
"Hence it is observed that communalism, casteism, provincialism and
nationalism are all of the same defective type. Those who are able to
capitalize on one of these sentiments advocate it volubly. In fact,
every one of these sentiments suffers from the defect of ism, and is
completely filled with narrowness, violence, envy, mean mindedness, etc.
Those who enter the field of social welfare by creating divisions
between “yours” and “mine”, substantially widen the fissures of
fissiparous intellect in human society."
"Those who want to promote the welfare of all human beings, remaining
above all sorts of parochial sentiments, have no alternative but to
embrace universalism with their heart and soul – there is no other way.
As universalism is totally devoid of any characteristic of ism, it is
not proper to depict universalism as an ism. If everyone is looked upon
as one’s own, no one remains beyond the periphery of one’s kith and kin.
Naturally, then, there is no scope for violence, envy, narrowness,
etc….The more the human mind becomes magnanimous or expanded, the more
it rises above the sentiments of tribalism, communalism, provincialism,
etc." (1)
Reference
1. Problems of the Day, Point #18
