Search This Blog

Tuesday, July 12, 2022

Gagging kundalinii + 2 more

Baba

Gagging kundalinii

Namaskar,

We all know that when doing sadhana, one should sit in the proper position with an erect spine according to the system. If this is not done, sadhana will not be proper.

Ananda Marga Caryacarya, “Padmásana (lotus posture): Place the right foot on the left thigh and the left foot on the right thigh. Clench the jaws and press the tongue against the roof of the mouth. You can maintain this posture as long as you like.” (1)

Senior Acarya Diary guides us that if one’s spine is bent then the kundalini will not be able to rise up. And that is what needs to happen in sadhana. The kundalinii resides in the muladhara cakra at the base of the spine. And when doing mantra japa, then the kundalini awakens. And if mantra japa continues then kundalini rises towards the sahasrara cakra.
http://anandamargauniversal.blogspot.com/

Poor show by two Dadas


But if one's spine is bent or curved, as shown in the below photo, then the pathway of the kundalinii is blocked and sadhana is useless. Sadly, the below two Dadas are setting a very bad example and not even trying to sit properly in sadhana:

(a)  In the first photo, Dadaji’s hands are not in the correct position; he is not sitting in padmasana, but rather bhojanasana, i.e. a posture used when eating. 

(b) In the second photo, Dadaji is sleeping so his spine is completely bent and his head has fallen to his chest.




 In the above photo, Dadaji’s hands are not in the correct position; he is not sitting in padmasana, but rather bhojanasana, i.e. a posture used when eating. 




In the above photo, Dadaji is sleeping so his spine is completely bent and his head has fallen to his chest.

That is why Baba’s directive is to sit with an erect spine preferably in padmasana. Those who want their sadhana to be fruitful should sit properly. Not only that, if someone near you is not sitting properly then their existential vibration will hurt you as well. Sincere sadhakas should watch in dharmacakra and if someone is obviously sleeping or sitting with a bent spine, then that person should be awakened and they should sit erect. Because posture is the most fundamental aspect of doing sadhana properly, as per Caryacarya. The central idea is that first and foremost one should sit in the proper posture for sadhana and then try to do the various steps.
http://anandamargauniversal.blogspot.com/


Dada ji is displaying his dirty laundry

In Human Society book, Baba guides those parents who are smoking or drinking liquor should give them up and be an example to their offspring. And if one cannot give them up then at least do not display these bad habits in front of kids. Similar is the case of some Dadas. These above two Dadajis are sitting in improper posture and then they put the photos on Facebook for the whole world to see. In my unit, avadhutas are revered so many new margiis started emulating Dadaji and they began sitting like this. I noticed this change in their posture and inquired about it. And they all said they learned this bent posture from seeing Dadaji’s photo on Facebook. So watch out, a negative example has far reaching effects.


Importance of keeping spine straight

#1: In the Senior Acarya Diary chapter on Iishvara pranidhana, section - “shuddhis”, Baba is describing that when sitting in meditation (padmasana, siddhasana, viirasana) one must keep the back straight so that the kundalini can the passage to rise upward from muladhara to sahasrara.
http://anandamargauniversal.blogspot.com/

#2: Ananda Marga philosophy states, “Tailless apes can be taught sádhaná after some effort. The tailed bipeds will not be able to do sádhaná like the tailless bipeds because the backbone of the tailed bipeds, containing the controlling points of the five fundamental factors, does not come in one line. The controlling points fall on a curved line, hence they cannot perform sádhaná properly.” (2)

#3: Ananda Marga philosophy states,” Mono-sided, straight or erect beings can perform sádhaná very well because all the five controlling points of the fundamental factors fall on a straight line...You see how fortunate you are to have a human biological structure. You have got a human frame. Humans should be obliged to Supreme Consciousness for this favour.” (3)

#4: Ananda Marga philosophy states, "The one who has followed the straight path of the sus'umna' canal upwards becomes one with Parama Purus'a." (4)

#5: Ananda Marga philosophy states, “Ujure uju cháŕi ná leo re báḿka. The word “uju” in Saḿskrta is derived from the Saḿskrta word “rju”. “Rju” means straight. The meaning of this line is “don’t accept the crooked path rejecting the straight one”. That is, just proceed along the path of “suśumná” not along the path of “id́á” and “piuṋgalá”.” (5)


How padma'sana helps in concentration

Our Ananda Marga system of sadhana adheres to the age-old yogic theorem: As you think so you become. So in order to achieve that high spiritual state one must first withdraw the mind from worldly propensities and goad the mind towards Parama Purusa.
http://anandamargauniversal.blogspot.com/

Hence our first duty in sadhana is not to allow our mind to run towards the external world via the indriyas (organs). Because when the 10 indriyas are sending signals to the brain and the brain engages in processing and receiving those messages, then one's mind becomes extroverted and restless, making sadhana impossible. So first and foremost in meditation is to withdraw the mind from these external stimuli. That means gaining control over the motor and sensory organs. Then one can begin to see within. And for this process, Sadguru Baba directs us that padma'sana is the most effective posture.


How to sit in sadhana

Everyone is aware that the lotus (padma) takes root in the mud and grows up through that murky pond water until it finally blossoms and flowers on the water's surface. Thus despite living in dirty surroundings the lotus flower maintains its pristine purity.

Likewise we human beings live in this busy world where everything is under the bondage of maya, yet we aim to keep the mind above this quinquelemental world - and towards the spiritual Goal. For this endeavour, padma'sana helps a lot.

Here below Baba directs us how to sit in lotus posture and at the same time describes the special import of padma'sana.

Ananda Marga philosophy says, "Padma'sana is the posture of sitting with the right ankle over the lift thigh and the left ankle over the right thigh, the tongue pushing the teeth out. In padma'sana alone, the vision can be fixed on trikuti - the middle point between the eyebrows. Just as the lotus blossoms forth in water, so also in this posture the mind tends to evolve. That is why this posture is termed padma'sana (padma - lotus, a'sana - posture). This is the best a'sana for meditation." (6)

So by sitting in padma'sana the mind naturally gets goaded toward the higher cakras, thereby helping one to succeed in meditation. That is why padma'sana is the top posture for sadhana.
http://anandamargauniversal.blogspot.com/


"Like a lotus transcending all the impurities"

In order to set a proper example for the people, Lord Shiva Himself would always take to this position.

Baba says, "Usually He [Lord Shiva] would sit in a posture called padma'sana . It is called padma'sana because it is just like a lotus in full bloom. Just as the roots and stems of the lotus remain under the water and only the leaves and flowers float above it -- and although it is born in the mud it sustains its love for the stars -- in the same way, people sitting in this lotus posture and remaining in the world, can keep their minds above their mundane environment. That is why on the path of sa'dhana' this posture has tremendous importance. Even though He took upon Himself all the physical and psychic responsibilities of the entire world, Shiva, when seated in this posture, was just like a lotus in full bloom, transcending all the impurities and dirt of the mind." (7)

So in the above quote Baba tells how this was the special posture used by Lord Shiva and then Baba again explains the special inner significance of sitting in padmasana and how it relates with the lotus flower.

Conclusion

Yet progressing in sadhana is not easy - it demands a strong commitment and a determined effort. Our each and every aspect of meditation should be proper and pointed. So if when doing meditation one just lazily sits in bhojana'sana (eating posture in cross-legged position) and one's sadhana is hazy and loose because the mind is not concentrated, then surely success remains a distant dream.
http://anandamargauniversal.blogspot.com/

Because to do anything great, it demands taking a strong vow and commitment. Only then can one reach the Goal.

For this reason, all great yogis take that special effort to sit for meditation in padmas'ana since it helps the mind rise up above the all worldly propensities and temptations, and enables one to move towards that spiritual stance.

Baba has given a step-by-step procedure for doing sadhana - everything from half-bath, to padmasana, to shuddhis all the way up to Guru puja and sastaunga pranam. If any of these steps - including padmasana are missing - then that qualifies as lazy sadhana.

Namaskar,
in Him,
Devadatta Pandey

For reasons of privacy we are not mentioning this Dada’s name. The above scene is from a sadhana program; if anyone is interested then we can show you the larger image.
http://anandamargauniversal.blogspot.com/

Ananda Marga Caryacarya says, "When children are five years old and attain some awareness, the parents, brothers, sisters or any guardian may initiate them in Na'ma Mantra [the preliminary process of meditation]. They should be taught to sit in padma'sana [lotus posture], but instead of interlocking the fingers, they may rest one palm upon the other; and keep the spine erect." (8)

Ananda Marga Caryacarya says, “After this, at the age of twelve, the child should take initiation from an ácárya/á in Sádhárańa Yoga, and at sixteen or afterwards, they should take initiation in Sahaja Yoga from the ácárya/á. If considered essential, ásanas may be taught before the age of sixteen.” (9)

Ananda Marga ideology guides us, “Proper attention should be paid to the physical, psychic and spiritual development of small boys and girls. Just as they sit and study to develop their intellectual capabilities, they should also sit to do their spiritual practices with their parents. That is the way they will develop their spiritual practices. They should take diikśá [spiritual initiation] from an ácárya(á) [spiritual teacher] when they grow up. They should practice the lessons of sádhaná – japa, dhyána, ásana, práńáyáma, etc. – along with their regular academic lessons. All that is necessary for their trifarious development, and it must be perfectly balanced. One should remember that the absence of a proper balance will harm not only the individuals, but also the society as a whole.” (10)

References
1. Caryacarya - 3, Asanas
2. Yoga Psychology, The Human Body Is a Biological Machine
3. Yoga Psychology, The Human Body Is a Biological Machine
4. Namami Krsnasundaram, Párthasárathi Krśńa and Vishiśt́ádvaetaváda (Discourse 16)
5. Ananda Marga Karma Yoga in a Nutshell, “Kurvanneveha Karmmáńi”
6. Táttvika Diipiká (Paiṋcama Parva)
7. Namaj Shivaya Shantaya, Discourse 20
8. Caryacarya - 1, chapter 2
9. Caryacarya 1- The Process of Initiation
10. The Awakening of Women, Táńd́ava and Kaośikii


== Section 2: Links ==

Recent postings
Other topics of interest


Sunday, July 10, 2022

Unidad de las malas personas

Baba

Unidad de las malas personas

Nota: Este artículo es solo para aquellos que tienen reverencia por Sadguru Baba Shrii Shrii Anandamurti ji y tratan de seguir Su ideología Ananda Marga.

Namaskar,

De vez en cuando, algunos están dando el llamado al arbitraje para unir a AMPS. Sobre este asunto todos debemos pensar y abarcar todos los ángulos. Consideremos algo de la historia:

(a) Después de 1990, algunos ingenuos pensaron que el liderazgo en AMPS era adecuado, pero en realidad no lo era.
(b) Debido a la falta de un líder benévolo entre 1990 y 2000, nuestra Ananda Marga Pracaraka Samgha enfrentó una situación muy negativa porque estaba en boga la llamada unidad o pacto negro.
(c) En esos días oscuros, incluso los purodhas estaban aterrorizados. Tuvieron que apoyar programas dogmáticos, contra su propia conciencia, para salvarse. De lo contrario, serían expuestos a la mala fama.
(d) Es por eso que se aprobó por unanimidad el apéndice de Caryacarya Parte 1, un dogma y una injusticia. Solo una persona ignorante puede pensar que realmente cada purodha estaba apoyando ese dogma e injusticia. El factor principal fue que estaban aterrorizados de enfrentar la reacción violenta de esos gobernantes. Era como ser parte del Politburó de la era soviética, es decir, "oponerse significa peligro".
(e) De 1990 a 2000 hubo una falsa unidad y todo aquel que planteaba algún punto dhármico y se oponía al Centro de Poder, fue expulsado, acosado, aterrorizado, marginado e incluso asesinado.
http://anandamargauniversal.blogspot.com/

Los que están sentados a distancia no entienden, pero los que trabajan muy de cerca son muy conscientes de todos estos puntos. Para ellos esto no es nada nuevo.


La unidad de la gente mala es dañina

Cualquier forma de arbitraje con estos diversos grupos no tiene sentido. Es adhármico unir a la gente mala. Eso traerá más sufrimiento y tortura a la gente buena. Estos tiranos grupistas se han desunido por el bienestar de la humanidad. Hay una gran causa detrás de su desunión. Si estuvieran unidos, causarían estragos por todas partes. Sería una situación muy desastrosa similar a la vida bajo Stalin y Hitler juntos.

En esta situación, quienes presionan por la unidad han caído presos de una perspectiva utópica. No tienen idea de lo que están hablando. Si los tiranos tienen el control total, nadie tiene derecho a hablar. Entonces, hay una razón cósmica por la cual los tiranos de hoy están involucrados en luchas internas y permanecen desunidos. Y es por eso que ninguna persona racional puede soportar ningún tipo de arbitraje en el entorno actual. Porque saben que habría un reino de terror si las partes están unidas.
http://anandamargauniversal.blogspot.com/

Por qué los grupos X e Y tienen miedo al arbitraje

No solo eso, incluso los grupos X e Y en AMPS no quieren arbitraje. Porque a los dos les aterra la idea de que el otro tenga el control del Dada PP. Piensan que "si voy al arbitraje y me veo obligado a ceder el control de mi Dada PP mientras el Dada PP del otro grupo obtiene el control total, entonces mi vida será terrible". Cada grupo, X e Y, es muy consciente de que el otro grupo es criminal y que ser obligado por un árbitro a seguir al otro grupo bajo el pretexto de la unidad será un infierno.

En verdad, la situación es como dos bandas criminales que nunca se unen, por temor a caer bajo el control del liderazgo despiadado del otro. Del mismo modo, en AMPS, ni el grupo X ni el grupo Y aceptarán nunca el arbitraje, por temor a quedar bajo el dominio del otro. Ambos grupos entienden cuánto poder ejercería el otro si obtuviera el control total; cada grupo conoce el enorme poder otorgado a quienes están al frente de AMPS. Por lo tanto, están completamente aterrados de que la parte contraria obtenga la autoridad total para dirigir la organización. Por esta razón, nunca aceptarán el arbitraje.
http://anandamargauniversal.blogspot.com/

Incluso entonces, supongamos que fuera a arbitraje y se dividiera 50-50, entonces todos los margiis generales y trabajadores de campo serían humillados, acosados, castigados y marginados.

Unidad de inmoralistas vs unidad de moralistas


La unidad real y fructífera solo puede ocurrir cuando estas personas que se hacen llamar líderes de grupo siguen la ideología de Ananda Marga y los Dieciséis Puntos. Entonces la gran estructura de AMPS puede funcionar.

Desde 1990 - 2000 cuando los diversos grupos se unieron en sus fechorías. Se inventaron tantos dogmas y se impusieron tantas reglas falsas y duras. Con ese fin, desmantelaron por completo el sistema bhukti pradhan y demolieron los derechos margii, entre tantos otros males e injusticias. Es una buena cosa, es decir, un regalo, que la llamada unidad de las personas malas no se haya alcanzado desde entonces. Si esa situación continuara hasta este momento, habría sido similar a la crueldad de la era de Stalin.

Recuerde que nuestro AMPS ha sido construido y diseñado como una especie de organización militar. No es una simple democracia; es selecto-electoral. Hay elecciones, sin embargo, cuando la corrupción dentro del escalón superior de la organización es rampante y los inmoralistas gobiernan, entonces todo el sistema se paraliza. Por esta razón, hoy en día incluso las fuerzas armadas tradicionales son mejores que las AMPS, ya que al menos las fuerzas armadas reconocen un sentido de justicia. Si bien ese no es el caso en esta era actual de grupismo en AMPS.

Es por eso que ningún margii que piense bien quiere la unidad en esta era actual, es decir, la unidad de las personas malas. Nadie quiere ser gobernado por un tirano despiadado. Eso significaría un desastre.
http://anandamargauniversal.blogspot.com/


Conclusión

Baba no dice: "Inmoralistas del mundo, únanse". Baba ha dado el lema: “Moralistas del mundo: ¡únanse, únanse!”. Esta fórmula universal es muy práctica para establecer la unidad en AMPS. Si los moralistas se unen en todos los niveles de la estructura desde el nivel de la aldea hasta Purodha Pramukha, solo entonces los inmoralistas serán derrotados. Y eso traerá paz real. De lo contrario, unir a todos los llamados líderes de grupo y sus aduladores inmoralistas bajo un mismo paraguas creará más daño que bien, como sucedía antes de la división.

En Él,
Viplava

~ Estudio en profundidad ~

Tu deber


 En un resumen en español de Prout in a Nutshell, “Your Mission”: En la sociedad, por un lado, vemos hordas de elementos antisociales y, por otro lado, sentimos una sensación de frustración entre los moralistas. Por lo tanto, estos moralistas han desarrollado una tendencia a salir de la sociedad. Con más riqueza y fuerza, los elementos antisociales están en una posición ventajosa, y los moralistas parecen ser los culpables. Este estado de las cosas no es ni deseable ni conveniente, y no se debe permitir que continúe.
  Tu deber será unir a los moralistas. Que haya dos campos. Que haya una lucha abierta. Los moralistas han estado dispersos durante tanto tiempo que no pudieron luchar. La fuerza unida de cinco moralistas es mucho más que la fuerza unida de cien inmoralistas porque hay una alianza impía entre estos últimos. La meditación a puerta cerrada no funcionará. Reúnan fuerzas mediante prácticas intuitivas y únanse contra los inmoralistas.
En un resumen en español de Prout in a Nutshell, “Your Mission”: Así que tu deber es triple. Tu primer deber es observar la moralidad y hacer prácticas intuitivas. Sin esto no puedes tener determinación mental. Tu próximo deber es unir a los moralistas del mundo, de lo contrario, el Dharma no perdurará. La masa explotada que no observa Yama y Niyama, los principios morales cardinales, no puede luchar contra su propio sentido de frustración. Por lo tanto, es necesario unir a los moralistas. (resumen en español)

En verdad, en ningún lugar Baba dice: “Los inmoralistas del mundo, únanse”. Por eso ningún Ananda Margii racional puede apoyar la unidad de los inmoralistas.

- Here is a link to the original English posting: Unity of bad people

- Here are more Spanish postings


Saturday, July 9, 2022

Prout against Gandhi’s satyágraha + 3 more

Baba
Prout against Gandhi’s satyágraha

Namaskar,

The following letter is related to the tradition of violent protests in Indian cities and towns over the last 90 years or so: What is the history behind how it started, who created it, how has it spread around, and how can this problem be resolved?

Recurring issue

The violence that arises from time to time that leads to the disruption of government services etc can be termed as satyágraha (civil disobedience). People in India are very familiar with this. Mahatma Gandhi was the originator of the civil disobedience movement which consisted of protesting by breaking the rules of society. For example, protesters will block a road or a moving bus or train because they have demands which are not being met. So the protestors see this as a way to draw the attention of the government. 

Consider another example: When there is an accident or a theft in a village then in order to gain publicity for their cause protesters will place huge logs of wood on the train tracks, or loosen the screws of a bridge deck, or activities which are even more extreme leading to the loss of lives of innocent people who are not even involved in the original incident. 

These are some examples of satyágraha (civil disobedience) —  using violent actions, damaging and destroying public infrastructure, and causing injuries to innocent people all in the name of creating pressure on the government to resolve their demands. 

Ananda Marga philosophy guides us, “What are humanistic appeals, or satyágraha [civil disobedience]? They are simply a special means of using violence to create circumstantial pressure.” (1)

Prout is against satyágraha, also known as civil disobedience.


Example of violent protest as expression of ‘Civil Disobedience’

Here below, followers of XYZ have banded together in protest and started wantonly burning vehicles of the common public in the street.


Above, followers of XYZ have banded together in protest and started wantonly burning vehicles of the common public in the street.


Why do people engage in civil disobedience?

There are two primary reasons that people commit civil disobedience: (1) to catch the attention of the government, and (2) to garner publicity around the country by burning cars, buses, trains, buildings, or by throwing stones or other dangerous items at innocent people who are not involved in any way with the protesters’ problems. Throwing stones, termed as “pathrao”, is very common in India, and protesters will grab stones from the streets and throw them at passing buses and trains, thus harming innocent people. Protests like this hark back to Gandhi’s civil disobedience movement — prior to Gandhi, violent protests did not exist.

Prout is against satyágraha, also known as civil disobedience.


Why are people involved in 'civil disobedience' and who are they?

Question: Are people involved in violent protests such as satyágraha (civil disobedience) (सत्याग्रह),  terrorists, or general people?

As an example, say teachers in a city are unhappy that their demands are not being fulfilled, then they will create violent protests to draw attention to their demands. These protests are created mostly by educated people in towns. Incidents like this also happen in villages but not so frequently. Yet, if there is a road accident in any village and someone dies, then people will block a road and burn a few vehicles passing by that road. And, in some instances, a person whose vehicle is involved in an accident may be beaten or even killed. 

So such types of violence are very dangerous, and can be traced in history to violent events which started in the period of the Indian independence movement and the Gandhian era. Another name of satyágraha (civil disobedience) is ándolan (protest, आन्दोलन). In protests anything can happen such as police vehicles get burnt, other goods get burnt etc., and these are normal consequences. 

Mahatma Gandhi started the civil disobedience movement, which consisted of protesting by breaking the rules of society; before Gandhi’s time, violent protests were not there.


Civil disobedience brings all types of misery 

In satyágraha (civil disobedience) there is neither Satya nor ágraha. The consequences lead to the loss of lives and public property, and increased consumer taxes. Life becomes very difficult during such protests. For instance, in India, violent protests are started by all political parties and these violent events are called “band” (बन्द). During a political party band everything remains closed for a certain period of time (such as a day or half day); but whose loss is it when the offices, industries, and businesses remain closed? Low income people who need their daily wage to sustain their lives cannot work on such days so they struggle to meet their basic needs. Furthermore, if the situation worsens, the government may take military action and impose a curfew which not only causes a loss to the local and national economy but also makes it harder for people to meet their basic needs. And, during a curfew, agitated people may create further violence leading to the loss of more lives, either of military personnel or of the general public.

Mahatma Gandhi started the civil disobedience movement, which consisted of protesting by breaking the rules of society. Prout is against satyágraha, also known as civil disobedience.


Sikh genocide by civil disobedience followers, 8000 killed

Another example is the aftermath of Indira Gandhi’s assassination, when Congress party people started killing Sikhs, even those who were supporting the Sikhs, and they also destroyed their businesses. History records that about 8,000 people were killed during those protests. Violent types of protests are usually committed by educated people, rather than thieves or vandals.

“The 1984 anti-Sikh riots, also known as the 1984 Sikh Massacre and the 1984 genocide of Sikhs, was a series of pogroms against Sikhs in India by anti-Sikh mobs (notably Congress Party members) in response to the assassination of Indira Gandhi by her Sikh bodyguards.
Deaths‎: ‎(official) 2,800; (unofficial) 8,000.
Perpetrators‎: ‎Congress Party members.
Date‎: ‎31 October – 3 November 1984.” [courtesy wikipedia]

And during the emergency in India: “In July 1975, famous political leader George  Fernandes aimed at blowing up toilets in government offices and causing explosions near the venue of public meetings to be addressed by Indira Gandhi. A plan was hatched to blow up a dais four hours before Indira Gandhi was to address a meeting in Varanasi. The conspiracy later came to be known as the infamous Baroda dynamite case.” [courtesy wikipedia]

People in India feel that satyágraha (civil disobedience) is normal, and nobody says anything against it. People believe that doing satyágraha (civil disobedience) is legal, fine, and do not raise any objections. Mahatma Gandhi started the civil disobedience movement, which consisted of protesting by breaking the rules of society.

Ananda Marga philosophy guides us, “What are humanistic appeals, or satyágraha [civil disobedience]? They are simply a special means of using violence to create circumstantial pressure.” (2)

Prout is against satyágraha, also known as civil disobedience.


Example of civil disobedience

In the case of XYZ, after his conviction, his followers killed many people, destroyed businesses, and the army was sent to establish peace in the region. Those protesters even killed many innocent people who were not even involved in any way with the incident. Similarly, many violent incidents happen to many people who are travelling by train — they are on the receiving end of cruelty by protesters.

Unfortunately, violent protests are now accepted in Indian society. Prout goes against such types of protests and guides us that rather people should be educated and taught that violent protests are not the solution. People do not learn in the heat of the moment; rather people can understand when things are normal. So in schools and colleges such teachings should be incorporated. And again, it was Mahatma Gandhi who started the civil disobedience movement which consisted of wanton destruction and violent protests.

Here below, followers of XYZ banded together in protest and wantonly burnt vehicles of the common public in the street.



What is the solution

So if satyágraha (civil disobedience) is not the right way, what should be done? If something is not right, protests can be done in a very peaceful manner, in an appropriate way. Violent protests only harm others, and, right after some violent incidents occur, people come forward and say violent actions are not the way to solve problems. But no one says anything about it when such incidents do not occur. There should be proper education in schools so children understand that such violent acts do not benefit anyone, they only cause harm. Prout is against satyágraha, also known as civil disobedience.


Prout solution of heinous act of civil disobedience

Prout is against satyágraha. The main tenet of satyágraha (civil disobedience) is that we should not obey the rules of society, but Prout says as long as rules are there we should follow. The world operates on rules, even animals have their own set of dos and don’ts. Unlike animals, human beings have the freedom to obey rules or not, but if human beings do not obey those rules then Prakrti punishes them. For example, one knows that smoking is not good for health, and still violating rules, one smokes. Then the result is failure of lungs, cancer and other diseases. So going against the rule that one should not smoke, leads to the punishment of cancer.

Here is another instance: There are speed limits on the roads to prevent drivers from speeding and causing accidents, even death. However, If drivers violate those rules and speed, then the consequences can be disastrous, not only for the driver but for any passengers and other road users. 


We should not disobey rules, rather change rules

One who does not follow rules, behaves like a mad dog. When a dog is affected by rabies, it just wants to bite anyone it sees, and does not like to drink any liquid or eat food. So, naturally, the result is death. So, we should not disobey rules, rather change rules in an appropriate and peaceful way.


Bring change by peaceful protest

Question: When the British ruled India, should their rules have been obeyed by the people of India?

Answer: Yes, obey the rules but try to bring change by peaceful protest showing placards etc, and educating the public about exploitation. By public education, awareness gradually comes and changes happen by peaceful means. Social change will come by doing extensive pracar and slowly those logical ways will be adopted by the masses.

MK Gandhi started the civil disobedience movement, which consisted of protesting by breaking the rules of society. Before Gandhi’s time, violent protests did not happen, and even terrorism was unknown. These violent protests are a direct result of satyágraha. Followers of Gandhi, such as Martin Luther King, started the civil rights movement in the US, based on Gandhi’s satyágraha. In the US, there are many violent protests which involve the burning of private vehicles and public property. They learned to do these things from Mahatma Gandhi. Prout is against satyágraha, also known as civil disobedience.


Yearly hundreds of thousands of crores rupees economic loss in India

So rules should not be broken, rather we should try and see how to change the rules. There is one chapter on satyágraha in Prout; people should read it. Society is ours, so it does not make sense to destroy public goods (burning cars, buses, and trains) and lives. In India alone, due to this, there are hundreds of thousands of crores rupees economic loss every year. As a result, taxes are increased, fares on buses and trains are increased. So in the moment of tension, people involved in violence do not realize the consequences and so they pay the price after that. Mahatma Gandhi started the civil disobedience movement, which consisted of protesting by breaking the rules of society.

Ananda Marga philosophy guides us, “What are humanistic appeals, or satyágraha [civil disobedience]? They are simply a special means of using violence to create circumstantial pressure.” (3)


Violent protesters are sub humans

So those who are involved in violent protests are irrational and misguided by their emotions. But for those innocent people on the receiving end, their lives are put in danger and even killed. 

What is the result of satyágraha (civil disobedience)? Ffom a spiritual viewpoint such violent demonstrations are very wrong as those involved in such destructive  protests do not have control over their anger. Second, destroying one’s own (i.e. public) property is harmful, dangerous, and wasteful, as once again public funds will have to be raised to repair all the damage. 

In Him
Niraka’ra
 
Prout is against satyágraha, also known as civil disobedience.

Here below, followers of XYZ have banded together in protest and started wantonly burning vehicles of the common public in the street.




Above, followers of XYZ have banded together in protest and started wantonly burning innocent people’s vehicles in the street.

This above article contains four sections

1. When did MK Gandhi’s satyágraha (civil disobedience) begin?
2. Why do people do this?
3. What are the consequences as a result (loss of private and public property)?
4. What is the teaching of PROUT regarding the civil disobedience movement? Prout teaches us that satyágraha (civil disobedience) is not right. We are to follow the rules of society; rather than breaking the rules, we should try to change them peaceably where needed.

Prout is against satyágraha, also known as civil disobedience.


Civil disobedience movement leads to public’s own economic loss

"Based on inputs received from various industry stakeholders across the states, we estimate that these states may face Rs.34,000 crore loss of economic activity due to the Jat agitation during the last few days," PHD Chamber president Mahesh Gupta said in a statement. (Courtesy of NDTV, India)

Ananda Marga philosophy guides us, “What are humanistic appeals, or satyágraha [civil disobedience]? They are simply a special means of using violence to create circumstantial pressure.” (4)

Prout is against satyágraha, also known as civil disobedience.

References
1. Prout in a Nutshell Volume 1 Part 3, Social Justice
2. Prout in a Nutshell Volume 1 Part 3, Social Justice
3. Prout in a Nutshell Volume 1 Part 3, Social Justice
4. Prout in a Nutshell Volume 1 Part 3, Social Justice


*        *        *

The below sections are entirely different topics, unrelated to the above material.
They stand on their own as points of interest.

*        *        *


== Section: Important Teaching ==

Directly receiving boon

Ananda Marga philosophy guides us, “Although the knowledge from the unconscious mind flows down to the subconscious only secondarily during the wakeful state, when it does flow down, in most cases it remains well-imprinted in the subconscious mind and thus easily enters the conscious mind from the subconscious. Many diseased or distressed persons, in order to gain the solutions for their sorrows, prostrate before the idols in the temples. In this situation, they are constantly thinking of their diseases and the remedies of their sufferings and the ways to remove them. This ultimately leads to the temporary concentration of the mind. When, after remaining in this state of concentration for a while, their minds ultimately become benumbed, then from the all-knowing unconscious mind the sought-after solution penetrates into their subconscious. Since such a state is a state neither of wakefulness nor of sleep nor of dream, the answer can easily penetrate the subconscious mind, and from the subconscious enter the conscious. People may think that the remedy to their distress was the boon of such-and-such god or goddess, but this was not actually the case at all.” (1)

Reference
1. Namah Shiváya Shántáya: Disc: 16



SUBJECTS TOPICS